![]() Why would his wife be warning him not to have anything to do with this "just" man, if all Pilate was there for was to hand out rewards? In both Biblical accounts of this episode, the Greek word translated seat, is the same word. The word Gabbatha means the knoll, a vernacular term for the Roman tribunal.We see that the whole idea makes no sense. Clearly, this isn't a seat for rewarding anyone. "When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he brought Jesus forth, and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called the Pavement, but in the Hebrew, Gabbatha."."When he was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him.".Clearly this makes these theories about its purpose only being for rewards, null and void. For example, Pilate sat on the judgment seat when Jesus was being accused of wrong doing. In fact, God clearly illustrates just the opposite. God's Word does not lend itself in support of such an obviously Biblically indefensible position. However, these secular ideas are not only contrary to all other doctrines of scripture concerning God's rewarding us for our work, but they are contradictory to the way the Greek word itself is used in the scriptures. Some claim that this particular seat was only used to reward, never to punish. So though their beliefs certainly cannot be proven Biblically, many of these theologians ( using secular testimony) have gone to great lengths to justify the doctrine, even though it clearly contradicts the Bible text itself. Second, proof by assertion where the actual evidence of scripture on the matter is ignored, fragmented, suppressed or denied. The first, by using extra-biblical documentation to support their theories. There are two ways that this erroneous doctrine has been introduced into Christianity. So they attempt to shape the word bema to conform to these predetermined beliefs. They have formulated a doctrine that holds that there is a adjudication specifically to judge the value of the Christian's service to the Lord. Likewise, the bema seat is simply the raised seating of someone sitting to judge.īut the problem of the so-called Bema seat judgment is not really one of misunderstanding the Greek, it is an exegetical problem where some teachers are reading their own presuppositions into the text. In our country one must approach the raised judgment area called the bench. Much the same as our courts today have established for judgments. In other words, seating that is raised above the level of the surrounding area. For example, the throne of a King is usually stepped seating. Thus bema simply refers to the raised seating of a judge or a king. It is therefore used to designate a stepped seating area for Judgment. ![]() The Greek word, which is translated seat, is from a root that means 'base' or the foot ( and by extension, step). However, the truth is a lot less complicated. The latter they believe to be the Judgment that God reserves for judicial verdict against transgressions by the wicked. The proponents of this doctrine call this the Bema seat judgment to distinguish it from what they term The White Throne Judgment. ![]() This phrase generally refers to the spurious Christian doctrine that teaches that believers must stand before God and be judged, not for their sins, but in order to determine the nature of rewards for their good works on earth. Ne of the more frequently asked questions is of the Bema Seat Judgment of Christians. Is the "Bema Seat Judgment" Biblical? by Tony Warren Frequently Asked Questions About Christianity, Answered Honestly!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |